![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burlington
Posts: 24,791
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burlington
Posts: 24,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North York
Posts: 1,614
|
http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20110413...aybook-review/
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North York
Posts: 1,614
|
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/t...ref=technology
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
Review by Walt Mossberg was negative.
He liked the device and the user interface but was negative on the inability to do email etc without being tethered to a blackberry and the lack of apps.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burlington
Posts: 24,791
|
There are a few pieces of software that are not available at launch time and tethering is the short term solution.
These items are coming but not at launch. Not a issue for me since my Blackberry smartphone works fine with my POP3 personal email but I'll be glad to have it on the device as well. I'll be patient. I can also access email via webmail. Once wifi tethering comes out for Blackberry handsets, it will also improve the overall experience since my experience with bluetooth tethering wasn't as straight forward. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 525
|
The user interface is the most important factor. Those two negatives are temporary -though you can do email and everything else with the browser.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North York
Posts: 1,614
|
Isn't the Playbook supposed to be able to run Android apps? I haven't seen a review of that functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burlington
Posts: 24,791
|
Apps need to be ported by android developer. Not sure if any are in production yet since the tool is very new for doing this.
Collection of reviews: More BlackBerry PlayBook Reviews Anandtech PCMag (Sascha Segan) BGR Josh Topolsky Engadget Gizmodo WSJ NYT CNET TechCrunch Laptop Mag Gigaom PCMag (Tim Gideon) Bloomberg USA Today Associated Press |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 2,663
|
Not a very warm reception looking at the first half-dozen or so reviews that are coming across the wire, with most reviewers panning the lack of apps, browser performance and particularly Flash performance as below expectations.
Most reviews concede there is strong potential, but many important elements are not available at launch. Given that RIM is last one to the party, I would have hoped they could waited and released a mature product instead of racing in with an unfinished offering. At the very least, an email client and a PIM, which is the one thing they should have had going for them!!! But...reviewers are known to be twits, so let's see how the market responds. Here's hoping that RIM can reinvent themselves with Playbook! |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 122
|
Android apps will run in VM.
Android runs on Cellphones, in VM. Cellphones with Android boot the Linux kernel then run the VM engine. All RIM has to do (not that minor, but do-able) convert VM engine from Linux to QNX. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burlington
Posts: 24,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A charted un-desert isle
Posts: 2,465
|
Interesting how much leeway james99 is willing to give Blackberry on their release, while so quick to find fault with the iPhone and iPad.
From the reviews, it sounds like they're rushing it out the doors just to say they have it released; for all intents and purposes, though, it sounds like another few months of development time would have lead to a much stronger first impression among many pundits. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
Yeah but it does Flash!
IMO, I think this is a huge disaster for Blackberry. Coming to market with a half baked product was a huge mistake. No one will care six months from now when the PlayBook finally lets you send texts and emails with it. And don't get me started on the tethering issue! Since it's baseball season, I'd say Apple's hit a home run, the Tab struck out, Xoom hit a single and the Playbook got on base with a walk. Next up: Acer and HP.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 540
|
RIM's approach always seems to be staid. I really don't see them taking the general tablet market by storm any time soon. They just don't have the "flash" (sorry) to capture that audience. As good, solid business tools, they rule, but I don't see a solid business reason for the Playbook. Do I really want to have to carry both?
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|