![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1516 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 422
|
If all these failures of the 630 are accurate, then the 630 is unprecedented in modern electronics for its poor quality. For products of normal quality, extended warranties are not necessary. This is why the stores push them so hard: they are generally pure profit.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#1517 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 75
|
You guys realize that the multiple receiver fee is purely for having more than one unit on your account right? The fee is not for extended warranty, however, Shaw provides a limited warranty on all units on the account if that account has the fee or is on an account that has the fee included.
|
|
|
|
|
#1518 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: OTTAWA
Posts: 1,422
|
So I only have one receiver and get charged a $2.49/month fee. Why? I thought it was an extended warranty after I started developing problems with my old 530. Had to switch that thing out about 4 times before getting the 630. This fee started showing up after about the 2nd exchange.
__________________
~Gary Shaw Direct 630 HD/PVR | WD My Book AV eHDD | Sharp Aquos 46" 120Hz LCD TV | Watch me LIVE! |
|
|
|
|
#1519 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 907
|
I will look it up again but pretty sure part of the fee description is a 'lifetime warranty' on all receivers. Has been beneficial to me.
|
|
|
|
|
#1520 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1521 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 118
|
Any chance the extra fee on your bill is the 1.5 percent Local Program Fund? Just asking...
|
|
|
|
|
#1522 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 907
|
There is a single receiver warranty fee.
As I understand it. |
|
|
|
|
#1523 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Okanagan, B.C.
Posts: 373
|
I've also heard that there is a single warranty fee. My theory would be that when you had to get replacements, they kind of back-dated the warranty and began charging you. I'm thinking it's this as I've heard of this in the past on a forum here somewhere. Specifically that you can back-date the warranty if you need a replacement, but aren't under warranty at that time. I'm presuming this would only be the case for people without multiple receivers, as in that case you have no choice but to pay the multi-receiver charge that gives you a warranty automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
#1524 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
|
Just to break this depressing thread up a bit I thought I'd drop in with my huge disappointment with PVRs in general. Why don't these sophisticated units have PiP capability?! With 2 SAT rcvrs and an HDD to source from, it seems rather sad they can't display more than a single video frame at a time.
Duh!
|
|
|
|
|
#1525 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary/Mesa
Posts: 279
|
The Hans, I have the single receiver fee(2.49 per month). It's worth every cent ( I have a 630 PVR which has been replaced twice).
|
|
|
|
|
#1526 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
|
Quote:
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary |
|
|
|
|
|
#1527 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Okanagan, B.C.
Posts: 373
|
Mellaby, I couldn't agree more! We have multiple receivers, so we get charged anyway. But even if we didn't, after all the replacements we've had I think it would be foolish not to pay this charge. It's a shame that the 630s act up so much that you need the warranty, but it's my "deal with the devil" because I love the 630 despite its quirks.
|
|
|
|
|
#1528 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 466
|
I've had 4 rcvrs for a couple almost 3yrs and have been paying the 5.99 fee and have never had to exchange any of my 200/500 and now 600 series rcvrs. So for me it's been a waste. I understand why they do it (to protect their own interests) but by the time i'll need to use warranty, i'll already have paid off a new unit.
I love my 630s as well. WAY more user friendly that the new Rogers PVR. That thing is a piece of garbage compared to the 630. does less, just has more capacity. People complain that the 630 only came with 320GB storage when it came out. Well the Rogers box only came out with 500GB when it came out 2 yrs later. Again, thankful i'm with Shaw vs Robbers. |
|
|
|
|
#1529 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary/Mesa
Posts: 279
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1530 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hastings,ON,Canada
Posts: 103
|
I started with Shaw Direct(then Star Choice)back in 2002,went from the dsr401,to 2 dsr505s(only minor problems: had to swap out a corrupt 401[no signal]one time,1st 505-went through 3,1st wouldn't take new guide,then the 2nd had a problem,but the 3rd has been great for yrs!)and now a pvr630.
So far,after just over a week,no problems. The only minor issue is that I've had to force 480i override in the 630's menu,as the video kept getting compressed horizontally on SD channels,and then bumping my Sony Bravia KDL46SL140 into 'widescreen full' mode,which forced 480i ota to go widescreen. Other than that,I like it so far. |
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| failure, favourites, hard drive, hdpvr630, reboot, shaw direct |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|