CRTC slaps down application for new HD stations - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Digital Industry Forums > Television Industry / Channels and Providers

Digital Home Helpful Information

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2008-09-04, 03:43 PM   #2
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 699
Default is that how the CRTC operates?

Anything in direct competition to what already has been proposed by our monopolistic media companies gets rejected..even if it doesnt even exist yet....
smootherator is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 04:19 PM   #3
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 550

A Canadian channel showing HD 24/7? Um, who could they possibly be competing with? Nobody does this. It's frustrating channel surfing some nights to find nothing in HD on Canadian channels.
tomm4004 is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 04:44 PM   #4
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 358
Default Policy naming

Shouldn't this be called the "anti-competitive policy"?

So if you're competing with the Rogers/Bell oligopoly, you'll be turned away at the gate?

I thought the CRTC was run by the government, not the telco industry.

"This year I'll be voting, but not for the first time. This year, Stephen Harper can kiss my ***, then kiss Jim Prentice."
gobisbay is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 05:29 PM   #5
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 220

Sometimes I really dislike living in Canada.

MistahTibbs is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 05:53 PM   #6
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 14
Cool Won't be the first time an application is denied for such reasons

Now had the applicants suggested an all Canadian content lineup, WELLLL
Now your getting somewhere.

The objecting networks and broadcasters would have had the objections overruled by the CRTC.
temp41 is offline  
Old 2008-09-05, 03:54 PM   #7
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Stratford, PE.
Posts: 3,099

Originally Posted by tomm4004 View Post
A Canadian channel showing HD 24/7? Um, who could they possibly be competing with? Nobody does this. It's frustrating channel surfing some nights to find nothing in HD on Canadian channels.
If you get Bell then here are the 24/7 HD channels

- Discovery HD
- HDNET Canada
- Equator
- Rush
- Treasure
- Oasis
(Did I miss any?)

The last four by the way are owned by the same Hi-Fidelity that the CRTC turned down. They have shown in the past that they can deliver HD 24/7 not the truncated 3 or 4 hours of HD a day most other Canadian HD stations provide . That the CRTC would turn them down is ludicrous.
reidw is online now  
Old 2008-09-04, 06:21 PM   #8
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto - Rogers 8300HD PVR
Posts: 3,368

Originally Posted by smootherator View Post is that how the CRTC operates?

Anything in direct competition to what already has been proposed by our monopolistic media companies gets rejected..even if it doesnt even exist yet....
Are you surprised? After the rejection of the well-though out application to operate a TV station in St. Catharines-Niagara Falls - by far the largest Canadian community to not have a TV station - it was quite clear that the CRTC doesn't possess much interest in anything except protecting monopolies.
nfitz is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 06:41 PM   #9
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Windsor ON Cogeco
Posts: 1,072

Wow... The only thing missing from this story is a banner on the top saying it's "The Onion" web page. I don't even think they could make up something so ridiculous. God forbid Canadians be offered a choice. A competitive policy that forbids you from competing. Hmmm.. Only in Canada you say?? Pity.
Aquos LC42D64U Yamaha HTR6080 Emotiva XPA-5 Polk CSiA6 RTiA7's RTiA1's Velodyne DLS4000R Mot. 6416 III PS3 Harmony One
wgauci is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 07:12 PM   #10
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 844

So much for the notion that they were going to allow Canadian channels to compete against one another, as discussed at the hearing the CRTC had in April?! I guess that isn't happening any time soon. Still waiting for a stupid decision to come down regarding that hearing and the supposed rule changes that were going to be made. What happened to the 'market-oriented' approach they were going to take?!

I think its about damn time that the CRTC is overhauled and some major reforms take place. The only purpose this committee (or whatever the hell it is) should have is to monitor content on the airwaves so nothing offensive is aired or nothing harmful to children. Aside from that the only other potential issue that they might have a say over is Canadian content and ensure that we get some quality programs instead of the filler junk networks air now just to meet their CDN content requirements. The CRTC should not be involved in distribution and dictating to consumers what they can and cannot watch- that is up to the people via their wallets and what they want to pay to watch.

On another note, regarding the applications themselves- the reason they were denied is because they were too broad in scope. They just wanted to air movies in HD, had they made the nature of service more specific, its possible that they may have been approved.
PlayitSimple is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 07:24 PM   #11
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St.Thomas, Ontario
Posts: 21

I've been saying these things for over 30 years! Yet they're still controlling what we watch and listen to.

Samsung LN-T4061F HD TV, Delhi VU-937sr W/ VU8PZ Power Zoom @ 50 ft. AGL, Sony XDR-F1HD Hi Def Radio tuner.
Zornblad is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 07:18 PM   #12
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Niagara Falls, ON
Posts: 24

nfitz: You beat me to it. I live in Niagara Falls and went to the CRTC hearing for TVN. There was huge local support for it and CHCH was nearly booed off stage whenever they said that they cover the Niagara Region. The reasoning behind TVN's rejection was equally ludicrous: The CRTC thought that the station would probably fail, so they weren't even allowed to try.

This latest decision is just further proof that the CRTC is looking out for big business, not for the Canadian people. I wish I could blame this on the Conservatives, but let's face it: the CRTC has always been like this no matter who's in office.
A day without sunshine is like... night.

There is an exception to every rule, including this one.
Anshar is offline  
Old 2008-09-04, 09:06 PM   #13
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 112
Default Please clarify, is this OTA or digital

Hugh, you said stations so the headline led me to believe OTA channels were being proposed but the article sounds like it's just another channel for satellite or digital cable.

Wasn't there a proposal from John Bitove a few months back to build an HD OTA network? Now that would have been nice.
randomusername2 is offline  
Old 2009-05-26, 02:52 PM   #14
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7

" very disappointed" in CRTC when it comes to john bitove

If Mr. Bitove can produce better picture quality with high bandwidth then he has the right to do so!

what is CRTC afraid of ?
jpo58 is offline  
Old 2009-05-26, 09:21 PM   #15
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 745

my opinion the CRTC caused more problems to the radiocommunication system in canada than it solved problems in 30 years of existence
gretzky is offline  

crtc, hdtv, high fidelity

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.

Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.